Neurofeedback for ADHD: Relearning lessons
Friday, February 25th, 2011I (re)learned a valuable lesson yesterday involving the importance of good communication between therapist and patient. It’s humbling to have to relearn things that you know intuitively as well as learned through long professional experience. The humility should serve me well. Humility has a way of doing that.
After training a seven year old boy with severe ADHD for about 12 sessions with neurofeedback, I was discouraged by the lack of progress that was reported by his mother. My solution was to change the reward frequency I had been using in his training. Instead of remaining in the infralow frequency range (.0001 Hz), the current iteration of the Othmer Method of neurofeedback, I raised his reward to 7 Hz based on the recommendation of a colleague who reported success in many cases of treating ADHD with this intervention. The youngster was unaware of the frequency change and continued to sit comfortably watching “Barnyard” on the computer monitor with the EEG leads on his scalp.
This particular boy had been on Concerta for the last 2 1/2 years, and as is often the case, the effectiveness of the prescription medication had waned to the point where he had regressed to engaging in dangerously impulsive behavior. That is what triggered the call for my neurofeedback services from his mother.
I knew I should share my intervention with his mother so that she could be attentive to any symptom changes or possible side effects from the change in reward frequency. I told mother about the change and explained my reasoning was based on the lukewarm treatment progress she had reported to date. Mother replied with an apology. She had not intended me to interpret her reports of progress as being limited in scope. This was her first experience with neurofeedback and she had no basis for comparison. She had only my initial presentation of the possible treatment outcomes for training away symptoms of ADHD using neurofeedback.
I decided to inquire a little deeper to better assess her report of her son’s treatment progress.
(Me) I understand that when your son began using Concerta he quickly showed a tremendous positive response to the medication. What percentage of that initially great medication response was lost by the time you called me for neurofeedback?
(Mom) About a 75% loss. It was so much that he was engaging in dangerously impulsive behavior, like riding his bicycle out into traffic at major intersections of busy streets without my knowledge. This was happening even when he was taking the medication.
(Me) Since we have been training him with neurofeedback, what percentage gain would you estimate he has made towards that originally good response he got from the medication?
(Mom) 60-75%.
(Me) Your saying that in these 12 sessions of neurofeedback your son’s symptoms of ADHD have remitted to nearly the point he was at when he first started the Concerta?
(Mom) Yes.
Glad I asked! I had been interpreting her someone stoic appearance and cautious reports of treatment progress as being lukewarm and needing an intervention to increase the effectiveness of the the neurofeedback. But making a 60-75% improvement in symptom reduction with a few weeks of neurofeedback training was hardly lukewarm!
Mom had tried withholding the Concerta on a weekend day and her son, quite naturally at this point, responded by becoming wholly undisciplined. His treatment progress while on medication reveals the fact that significant measurable changes are possible in treating children with ADHD using neurofeedback even while they are on prescription medication.
Now I will need to evaluate the merit of changing that reward frequency. We weren’t doing so bad after all!